Impact Finance Research Consortium Releases Report Exploring Catalytic Capital in Impact Investing
The Impact Finance Research Consortium (IFRC) has released a detailed report shedding new light on the features and applications of catalytic capital, investments bearing a high level of risk or accepting lower returns to stimulate positive social and environmental outcomes that would likely not be possible otherwise. The IFRC is a collaboration of faculty and staff at the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Initiative at the Wharton School, Harvard Business School, and the University of Chicago Booth School of Business to advance research on impact investing. This report—titled “Catalytic Capital in Impact Investing: Forms, Features, and Functions”—is the latest result of the IFRC’s work to build the evidence base of impact investing.
The report is based on nearly 200 responses to a comprehensive survey developed by the IFRC to better understand impact investing strategies and practices, including when, how, and why impact investors deploy catalytic capital. Additionally, it draws on 21 interviews with a variety of impact investors who reported using catalytic capital in the survey.
“Although much has been written on the value of and need for catalytic capital, relatively little is known about how catalytic capital works and how catalytic investors view their role in relation to the broader impact investing ecosystem,” notes Katherine Klein, Edward H. Bowman Professor of Management, Faculty Co-Director of the Impact Investing Research Lab at the Wharton School, and one of the authors of the report.
To address this knowledge gap, the report provides a broad descriptive overview of catalytic capital, including the reasons that impact investors cite for utilizing catalytic capital and the challenges they face when deploying it. Additionally, insights from the report reveal fund characteristics linked to catalytic capital, including smaller size, greater use of debt, more focus on emerging economies, less support from traditionally returns-focused limited partners, and more.
Furthermore, the report highlights that catalytic capital is not an all-or-nothing strategy; rather, funds often adopt a hybrid approach by blending catalytic and non-catalytic capital to generate positive impact. Indeed, the report shows that over 40 percent of impact funds surveyed blend catalytic and non-catalytic capital in their investment portfolios. As explained in the report, “this variable aspect of catalytic capital presents an opportunity for field-building.” Impact investors can thus be encouraged to experiment with catalytic approaches, enabling them to pursue more or less catalytic deals depending on their strategic priorities.
The report is one of 14 research projects funded by the Catalytic Capital Consortium to promote knowledge and awareness of catalytic capital. “This report offers valuable insight into the practice of catalytic capital across sectors and markets,” says Urmi Sengupta, chair of C3’s Project Advisory Board and a senior program officer at the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. “By describing how and why investors provide catalytic capital, it can help others evaluate opportunities to deploy this type of innovative, high-impact financing and fuel progress on some of the world’s most pressing challenges.”
The IFRC’s report stands as a landmark study in the realm of impact investing, offering a comprehensive understanding of catalytic capital’s nuances and potential. As the industry seeks actionable insights, this document will be an important reference, shedding light on innovative strategies to achieve both financial returns and meaningful social impact.
